Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api

From: Alan Cox
Date: Mon Jan 23 2006 - 16:09:50 EST


On Llu, 2006-01-23 at 12:28 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Yes, that's possible.. In the current patch that is not a problem, because
> > the internal pid (aka kpid) == <vpid,containerid> mangeled together.
> > So in those cases, the kernel would have to keep <pid, container_id>
>
> Agreed, and for the internal implementation I think having them mangled
> together make sense, so long as we never export that form to userspace.

You have to refcount the container ids anyway or you may have stale
container references and end up reusing them.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/