Re: more cfq spinlock badness

[Dave Jones]

On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 12:02:28PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:

 > >  > if you are using that? The bug above has in the
 > >  > past always been able to be explained by a driver destroying a structure
 > >  > embedding the queue lock before the queue is dead.
 > > 
 > > as there were no ub devices plugged in at the time, I think
 > > Pete is off the hook for this one.
 > 
 > The ub fix hasn't been merged yet.

Really? I thought Pete synced up a whole bunch of ub bits including that already.

 > Just trying to be absolutely certain
 > that you didn't have that loaded?

99.9% sure. (It was a few days ago, and I'm already forgetting details).

		Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/