Re: 2.6.15-rt16

[Clark Williams]

On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 16:47 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 12:39 -0600, Clark Williams wrote: 
> > On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 13:32 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > 
> > > I'm still curious to what's happening with your kernel.  I'm currently
> > > running my x86_64 (typing right now on it) with CONFIG_SMP=n and
> > > CONFIG_LATENCY=y.  I know you probably sent a config before, but could
> > > you send it to me again.  (probably best to send it to me off list)
> > 
> > yeah, it's been gnawing at me too. Not really stopping me, but I've seen
> > it happen on two Athlon64's (3000+ and 3400+). 
> > 
> > I'll send the .config offlist.
> 
> Clark,
> 
> Could you make sure that your modules in the initrd that you use are the
> ones created with the LATENCY_TRACE option.  After converting all the
> modules into compiled in options, I successfully booted the kernel.  So
> you might have an incompatibility with the modules in initrd, when you
> turn on LATENCY_TRACE.

Did you ever duplicated the failure?

I'm fairly certain that the initrd contains the appropriate modules,
since I regenerate the initrd each time I generate a new kernel, but
I'll go back and verify. 

I'll also convert modules to compiled in and see if that makes a
difference.

Clark

-- 
Clark Williams <williams@xxxxxxxxxx>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part