Re: adding swap workarounds oom - was: Re: Out of Memory: Killed process 16498 (java).

From: Jens Axboe
Date: Fri Feb 03 2006 - 08:50:41 EST


On Fri, Feb 03 2006, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> Yes, I think it is suse. I just diffed /mm of both the above kernels
> (.193 and .201) and I think there is a little typo which probably causes
> the problem. It is mm/vmscan.c::shrink_zone():
>
> @@ -845,19 +845,38 @@ shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, int max_s
> }
>
> atomic_add(scan_active + 1, &zone->nr_scan_active);
> - count = atomic_read(&zone->nr_scan_active);
> - if (count >= SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX) {
> + nr_active = atomic_read(&zone->nr_scan_active);
> + if (nr_active >= SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)
> atomic_set(&zone->nr_scan_active, 0);
> - refill_inactive_zone(zone, count, ps, can_free_mapped);
> - }
> + else
> + nr_active = 0;
>
> atomic_add(max_scan, &zone->nr_scan_inactive);
> - count = atomic_read(&zone->nr_scan_inactive);
> - if (count >= SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX) {
> + nr_inactive = atomic_read(&zone->nr_scan_inactive);
> + if (nr_active >= SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)
> ^^^^^^^^^ Should be nr_inactive I think.
>
> Comparing to code in current linux-2.6.git/mm/vmscan.c confirms that it
> should be nr_inactive.
>
> atomic_set(&zone->nr_scan_inactive, 0);
> - return shrink_cache(zone, gfp_mask, count, total_scanned, can_free_mapped);
> + else
> + nr_inactive = 0;
>
> Jens, given you have an @suse email address, do you want to kick whoever
> deals with this in novel/suse so it gets fixed in the next sles9 kernel
> update?

Auch, that looks nasty. I'll forward this, thanks!

--
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/