Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation

[David S. Miller]

From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 15:50:27 -0800

> The !!  doesn't seem needed.  The name of this function implies that it
> returns a boolean, not a scalar.

As a historical note it used to be a common implementation error to
return "flag & bit" from this function instead of the correct
"(flag & bit) != 0".

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/