Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Mon Feb 06 2006 - 04:56:30 EST


Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Is page vs slab cache the appropriate level of granularity?
>

I guess so. Doing it on a per-cpuset+per-slab or per-cpuset+per-inode
basis would get a bit complex implementation-wise, I expect. And a smart
application could roughly implement that itself anyway by turning spreading
on and off as it goes.

One does wonder about the buffer-head slab - it's pretty tightly bound to
pagecache..

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/