Re: [PATCH 2/8] UML - Define jmpbuf access constants

[Jeff Dike]

On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 09:37:13AM -0800, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> I assume you have your own setjmp implementation and are not using the
> libc version?

Nope, that would be the next step if this turned out to be untenable,
which I guess it is.

> If you don't then there is a problem.  There is a good reason why the
> constants are removed: you couldn't use the values anyway.  Your don't
> have the information to "decrypt" them.  

You're actually encrypting them somehow?  How?  And why?

Is there a reason there can't be an API for looking at the contents of
a jmp_buf?

				Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/