Re: [PATCH -mm] swsusp: fix mistake in documentation
From: Pavel Machek
Date: Fri Feb 10 2006 - 07:27:39 EST
On Pá 10-02-06 13:14:44, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This patch fixes a mistake in the swsusp documentation.
> Please apply.
BTW, I believe that Andrew hates these Hi, Please apply and greatings
in patches; because he has to manually strip them down. There's some
'---' convention to work around them, but it is probably easier to
just be "rude" with him and only pass changelog in the mail. Not sure
what to do with diffstat.
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
ACK, if it is worth anything.
I got these in mail today:
18 T 10-02-06 akpm@xxxxxxxx ( 144) - swsusp-low-level-interface-rev-2-fix.patch removed fro
19 T 10-02-06 akpm@xxxxxxxx ( 107) - suspend-to-ram-allow-video-options-to-be-set-at-runtim
20 T 10-02-06 akpm@xxxxxxxx ( 84) - swsusp-userland-interface-update.patch removed from -m
21 T 10-02-06 akpm@xxxxxxxx ( 101) - suspend-update-documentation.patch removed from -mm tr
22 T 10-02-06 akpm@xxxxxxxx ( 108) - led-add-sharp-charger-status-led-trigger-tidy.patch re
...I quite like those patches, and I do not see them going to
Linus. Should I just be more patient, or did they go into some
top-secret-tree I do not know about (but not yet to Linus)?
Web maintainer for suspend.sf.net (www.sf.net/projects/suspend) wanted...
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/