Re: [rfc][patch] sched: remove smpnice

[Andrew Morton]

Peter Williams <pwil3058@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I don't think either of these issues warrant abandoning smpnice.  The 
>  first is highly unlikely to occur on real systems and the second is just 
>  an example of the patch doing its job (maybe too officiously).  I don't 
>  think users would notice either on real systems.
> 
>  Even if you pull it from 2.6.16 rather than upgrading it with my patch 
>  can you please leave both in -mm?

Yes, I have done that.  I currently have:

sched-restore-smpnice.patch
sched-modified-nice-support-for-smp-load-balancing.patch
sched-cleanup_task_activated.patch
sched-alter_uninterruptible_sleep_interactivity.patch
sched-make_task_noninteractive_use_sleep_type.patch
sched-dont_decrease_idle_sleep_avg.patch
sched-include_noninteractive_sleep_in_idle_detect.patch
sched-new-sched-domain-for-representing-multi-core.patch
sched-fix-group-power-for-allnodes_domains.patch

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/