Re: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
From: Kyle Moffett
Date: Sat Feb 11 2006 - 03:52:24 EST
On Feb 10, 2006, at 18:35, Pavel Machek wrote:
Anyway, it means that suspend is still quite a hot topic, and that
is good. (Linus said that suspend-to-disk is basically for people
that can't get suspend-to-RAM to work, and after I got suspend-to-
RAM to work reliably here, I can see his point).
I completely agree. My Mac PowerBook has had suspend-to-RAM for a
long time; I shut the lid and about 3 seconds later it's asleep, open
it and 3 seconds later it's awake. Leave it sleeping for a week on a
full charge, come back to find it still asleep. I can even put it to
sleep, remove a drained battery and put in a fresh one (it has a
small internal 2-minute RAM battery), then wake it up and resume
work. I'm curious though, what proportion of laptop hardware
actually has support for suspend-to-RAM? (including hardware for
which linux does not yet have support). What percent of that
hardware _does_ have Linux support?
Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
--
If you don't believe that a case based on [nothing] could potentially
drag on in court for _years_, then you have no business playing with
the legal system at all.
-- Rob Landley
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/