Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.

[Eric W. Biederman]

Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> - If you want my cheerfully uninformed opinion, we should toss both of
>   them out and implement suspend3, which is based on the kexec/kdump
>   infrastructnure.  There's so much duplication of intent here that it's not
>   funny.  And having them separate like this weakens both in the area where
>   the real problems are: drivers.

Ahh!!! I'm surrounded.

suspend by kexec
suspend by migration

Is there a way out?

Can I avoid it?

Do all roads lead to suspend?

:)

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/