Re: max symlink = 5? ?bug? ?feature deficit?
From: Linda Walsh
Date: Sun Feb 12 2006 - 17:52:37 EST
Al Viro wrote:
Care to RTFS? I mean, really - at least to the point of seeing what'sHmmm...that's where I got the original parameter numbers, but
involved in that recursion.
I see it's not so straightforward. I tried a limit of
40, but I quickly get an OS hang when trying to reference a
13th link. Twelve works at the limit, but would take more testing
to find out the bottleneck.
As an algorithmic detail, I can see how
file a->b->c->d... etc can easily use tail-recursion, but I'm not
quite as clear why "prefix-recursion" couldn't be used to reduce
the recursion complexity as in the case:
dir0/, link0->dir0, link1->link2 ... It seems it would be the
left hand compliment of tail recursion. Not sure what would be
involved, but would eliminate some stack considerations if it was
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/