Re: [PATCH 02/13] hrtimer: remove useless const

[Roman Zippel]

Hi,

On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:

> Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > your patch makes code larger on gcc3.
> 
> By 120 bytes here.  I dropped the patch.

Is this really worth it? This _is_ a compiler problem, are we going to add 
now const everywhere to work around a (small) compiler problem, which is 
already fixed in newer versions?

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/