Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
From: Jan Engelhardt
Date: Mon Feb 13 2006 - 11:37:20 EST
>> This is blatantly incorrect. You *were* talking about stat->st_rdev:
>> On 2/10/06, *Joerg Schilling* <schilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > The struct stat->st_rdev field need to be stable too to comply to
>> > POSIX?
>> You may claim you *never meant to* or you *never realized* you were
>> talking about, but you can't say you never talked about it - that's an
>> outright lie.
>You are lying here.
>I did not write st_rdev and from my previous mail it was obvioys that
>I was referring to st_dev.
Exactly. But I asked specifically about Rdev... see "stable too"
(=German: "Muss st_rdev auch stabil sein?")