Re: [PATCH 02/13] hrtimer: remove useless const

[Andrew Morton]

Roman Zippel <zippel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
>  > const arguments to functions are pretty useful for code readability and
>  > maintainability too, if you use them consistently.
> 
>  I could understand that argument, if gcc would warn about it in any way.

It does.  If a function tries to modify a formal argument which was marked
const you'll get a warning.

We're talking about different things here.  My point is that it is
perverted and evil for a function to modify its own args (unless it's very
small and simple), and a const declaration is a useful way for a
maintenance programmer to be assured that nobody has done perverted and
evil things to a function.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/