Re: [PATCH] tty reference count fix

[Paul Fulghum]

Paul Fulghum wrote:
> Your patch leaves the schedule() call at the bottom of
> the while loop between setting tty_closing and
> setting TTY_CLOSING flag.

Nevermind. After schedule() the count is reread,
so you are right. Dropping tty_sem altogether
would work.

It is a matter of where you ultimately wish to
push the locking to BKL or tty_sem.

--
Paul Fulghum
Microgate Systems, Ltd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/