Re: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter

[H. Peter Anvin]

Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Surely you're not suggesting that TOG's job is to rubber-stamp bad 
> > Solaris decisions...
>
> Are you interested in forcing Solaris to change all interfaces?

In this case, I think it would be entirely appropriate.  It's hardly a 
hardship to maintain the legacy names for backwards compatibility; since 
those names are nonsensical it is unlikely they'll ever want to be 
claimed, in which case they can be maintained indefinitely.

However, I would find it much, much worse if names that are *actively 
misleading and confusing* to the programmer would be included in an 
international standard and therefore forced upon the rest of the world 
forever.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/