Re: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter
From: Joerg Schilling
Date: Tue Feb 14 2006 - 13:50:26 EST
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >Do you have a better proposal for naming the interfaces?
> >> chownfn maybe. (fd + name)
> >I am not shure if this would match the rules from the Opengroup.
> >Solaris has these interfaces since at least 5 years.
> This is not the cdrecord thread so Solaris is a no-go in this very one.
I encourage you to read a mail before you answer to it.
This may help you to avoid writing incorrect replies.
EMail:joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
schilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/