Re: [PATCH] ia64: simplify and fix udelay()
From: Jack Steiner
Date: Wed Feb 15 2006 - 10:06:22 EST
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 01:08:41AM -0800, Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
> hawkes@xxxxxxx wrote on Tuesday, February 14, 2006 10:40 AM
> > a preemption and migration to another CPU during the
> > while-loop
> Off topic from the subject line a bit, but related: how many Altix
> SN2 customers in the field turn on CONFIG_PREEMPT? Redhat EL4 doesn't
> turn on preempt, SuSE SLES9 and SLES10 beta don't turn it on either.
> Is there a real benefit of turning that option on for SN2?
AFAICT, no one at SGI uses or plans to use CONFIG_PREEMPT. Most of
our customers use kernels from one of the distros & none at this point
The realtime folks here have experimented with CONFIG_PREEMPT but so
far have not seen any significant benefit.
Regardless, we should fix udelay() to handle unsync'ed ITCs. It would
be nice to have it working.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/