Re: [PATCH 12/13] "const static" vs "static const" in nfs4

[Jesper Juhl]

On 2/24/06, Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 21:49 +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > My previous "const static" vs "static const" cleanup missed a single case,
> > patch below takes care of it.
> >
>
> I can shepherd that in for 2.6.17 (unless Andrew wants to make it a
> 2.6.16 priority?).
>

No need for that. It's just something that ICC complains about
"storage class not being first" - gcc doesn't care.

2.6.17 is fine, no need to rush that one.

Just a small thing that might as well be done :)

--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/