Re: OOM-killer too aggressive?

[Andrew Morton]

Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 10:21:52AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Chris Largret is getting repeated OOM kills because of DMA memory
> > > exhaustion:
> > > 
> > > oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1, order=3
> > > 
> > 
> > This could be related to the known GFP_DMA oom on some x86_64 machines.
> 
> What known GFP_DMA oom? GFP_DMA allocation should work.
> 

There's a problem on some x86_64 machines which confuses the BIO layer. 
BIO makes simple decisions about bounce pfns and some x86_64 memory layouts
cause them to go wrong.  Net effect: lots of GFP_DMA allocations in the BIO
layer.

http://readlist.com/lists/vger.kernel.org/linux-kernel/36/182357.html
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175173
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/