Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions

[Randy.Dunlap]

On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:40:53 +0100 Jens Axboe wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 27 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:54:17AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > >Subject    : 2.6.16-rc[34]: resume-from-RAM unreliable (SATA)
> > > >References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/20/159
> > > >Submitter  : Mark Lord <lkml@xxxxxx>
> > > >Handled-By : Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >Status     : one of Randy's patches seems to fix it
> > > 
> > > 
> > > This is not a regression, libata suspend/resume has always been crappy. 
> > >  It's under active development (by Randy, among others) to fix this.
> > 
> > It might have always been crappy, but it is a regression since
> > according to the submitter it is working with 2.6.15.
> 
> It might have worked under lucky circumstances with an idle disk and a
> goat sacrifice, so I agree with Jeff that this is definitely not a
> regression. To my knowledge, Mark always used my libata suspend patch on
> earlier kernels so it's not even an apples-apples comparison.
> 
> So please scratch that entry.

I'll third that request/comment.

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/