Re: [patch 2.6.16-rc5-mm2] sched_cleanup-V17 - task throttling patch1 of 2

[Peter Williams]

Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 10:58 +1100, Peter Williams wrote:
>
>
> > If you're going to manage the time slice in nanoseconds why not do it 
> > properly?  I presume you've held back a bit in case you break something?
>
>
> Do you mean the < NS_TICK thing?  The spare change doesn't go away.

Not exactly.  I mean "Why calculate time slice in jiffies and convert to 
nanoseconds?  Why not just do the calculation in nanoseconds?"

> > If it helps, the smpnice balancing code's use of static_prio_timeslice()
> > doesn't really care what units it's return value is in as long as 
> > DEF_TIMESLICE is in the same units and contains the size of a time slice 
> > allocated to a nice==0 non RT task.
>
>
> Ok, thanks.  I wanted to make very certain I couldn't screw it up.
> Still, it's simpler to just leave it in ticks.
>
> 	-Mike

Peter
--
Peter Williams                                   pwil3058@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
 -- Ambrose Bierce
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/