Re: initcall at ... returned with error code -19 (Was: Re:2.6.16-rc5-mm2)

[Paul Jackson]

Andrew wrote:
> That's OK - it's -ENODEV. 

I can't help but wonder if the particular case of -ENODEV should
be kept quiet, as in the following totally untested patch:

diff -Naurp 2.6.16-rc5-mm2.orig/init/main.c 2.6.16-rc5-mm2/init/main.c
--- 2.6.16-rc5-mm2.orig/init/main.c	2006-03-06 17:02:46.491860190 -0800
+++ 2.6.16-rc5-mm2/init/main.c	2006-03-06 17:07:29.754830844 -0800
@@ -608,7 +608,8 @@ static void __init do_initcalls(void)
 
 		result = (*call)();
 
-		if (result) {
+		/* don't mind -ENODEV - just a driver w/o hardware */
+		if (result && result != -ENODEV) {
 			sprintf(msgbuf, "error code %d", result);
 			msg = msgbuf;
 		}

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/