Re: [patch] i386 spinlocks: disable interrupts only if we enabled them

[Ingo Molnar]

* Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> And it's increasing text size.  Which wouldn't be a big problem if the 
> spinning code was still in an out-of-line section, but it isn't any 
> more.
> 
> (I forget why we undid that optimisation.  What was wrong with it?)

we dont inline that code anymore. So i think the optimization is fine.

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/