Re: [PATCH 18 of 20] ipath - kbuild infrastructure

From: Roland Dreier
Date: Thu Mar 09 2006 - 13:57:53 EST


Sam> Eventually - yes. But not just now. Kbuild was introduced
Sam> because it was needed in the top-level directory and it made
Sam> good sense to do so. But for now keeping Makefile is a good
Sam> choice. This is anyway what people are used to.

OK, disregard my suggestion then. Should we patch
Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.txt to correct the current
documentation, which says:

The preferred name for the kbuild files is 'Kbuild' but 'Makefile'
will continue to be supported. All new developmen is expected to use
the Kbuild filename.

- R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/