Re: RFC: radix tree safety

[Nick Piggin]

Andrew Morton wrote:
> corbet@xxxxxxx (Jonathan Corbet) wrote:

> > If we don't want the tests, fine, but it might make sense to fix the
> > interface documentation, at least, to note that "tag" is not an
> > arbitrary integer value.
>
>
> Sure, we can live with the runtime cost of a documentation fix ;)

How about making the code self-documenting and more useful at the same
time: put RADIX_TREE_TAGS in radix-tree.h, and call it RADIX_TREE_MAX_TAGS

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/