Re: does swsusp suck after resume for you? [was Re: Faster resuming of suspend technology.]

[Andreas Mohr]

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 04:13:10PM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> Since my warning probably scared anyone from actually trying this patch I've 
> given it a thorough working over on my own laptop, booting with mem=128M. The 
> patch works fine and basically with the patch after resuming from disk I have 
> 25MB more memory in use with pages prefetched from swap. This makes a 
> noticeable difference to me. That's a pretty artificial workload, so if 
> someone who actually has lousy wakeup after resume could test the patch it 
> would be appreciated.

I did try it, but ran into weird unrelated compile failures multiple times
(sorry, no log).

Andreas Mohr
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/