Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal
From: Zachary Amsden
Date: Tue Mar 14 2006 - 11:21:36 EST
Rik van Riel wrote:
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Zachary Amsden wrote:
There is a Signed-off-by line on every patch I send out,
You're right. It was just the first 1/24 that was missing it,
it was there in the second copy.
BTW, I have no idea why the first 1/24 was missing it. I checked right
before sending, and it was there - perhaps I forgot to save my changes.
The second copy turned out fine, but didn't make it to LKML. Everyone
cc'd directly got it, but the LKML filter has a ban on the word
propasition, and being blackholed by it, I merely assumed the patch was
too large - so I split it up, and actually ended up binary searching
down to the problematic section before finding the taboo list.
_Every_ problem eventually turns into a binary search.
Zach
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/