Re: does swsusp suck after resume for you? [was Re: Fasterresuming of suspend technology.]

[Lee Revell]

On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 12:51 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> "we have just
> finished big&ugly memory trashing job, can we get our interactivity
> back"? Like I'd probably cron-scheduled it just after updatedb 

The updatedb problem is STILL not solved?  I remember someone proposed
years ago to have it use fcntl() or fadvise() to tell the kernel that we
are about to read every file on the system and to please not wipe the
cache - I guess this was never done?

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/