Re: OOPS: 2.6.16-rc6 cpufreq_conservative
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Sat Mar 18 2006 - 19:58:38 EST
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Gaah. Looking at the assembly code to try to figure out where the oops
> happened, one thing is clear: "for_each_cpu_mask()" generates some truly
> horrible code. C code that looks simple ends up being tons of complex
> assembly language due to inline functions etc.
> We've made it way too easy for people to write code that just absolutely
Yes, uninlining merely first_cpu() shrinks my usual vmlinux by 2.5k. I'll
fix it up.
Meanwhile, I suppose we need to check that pointer for NULL as Parag
suggests. I might stick a once-off WARN_ON() in there so someone gets in
and works out why we keep on having to graft mysterious null-pointer
avoidances into cpufreq.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/