Re: unresolved emu10k1 synth symbols.

From: Takashi Iwai
Date: Tue Mar 21 2006 - 06:03:28 EST


At Tue, 21 Mar 2006 00:46:34 -0500,
Dave Jones wrote:
>
> I just noticed this whilst booting 2.6.16 on a test box
>
> snd_emu10k1_synth: Unknown symbol snd_emu10k1_ptr_read
> snd_emu10k1_synth: Unknown symbol snd_emu10k1_synth_copy_from_user
> snd_emu10k1_synth: Unknown symbol snd_emu10k1_voice_free
> snd_emu10k1_synth: Unknown symbol snd_emu10k1_synth_free
> snd_emu10k1_synth: Unknown symbol snd_emu10k1_ptr_write
> snd_emu10k1_synth: Unknown symbol snd_emu10k1_synth_bzero
> snd_emu10k1_synth: Unknown symbol snd_emu10k1_voice_alloc
> snd_emu10k1_synth: Unknown symbol snd_emu10k1_memblk_map
> snd_emu10k1_synth: Unknown symbol snd_emu10k1_synth_alloc
>
> This kernel was configured with CONFIG_SND_EMU10K1=m
> and CONFIG_SND_SEQUENCER=m
>
> This looks like it can't possibly work, unless I change
> CONFIG_SND_EMU10K1 to =y. Is exporting a symbol from one
> module to another actually supposed to work?
> I thought this was why we had the ill-fated intermodule_register() ?.

Weird. By modprobe, snd-emu10k1 module should be loaded in prior to
snd-emu10k1-synth because of the dependency of above symbols.

How is snd-emu10k1-synth module loaded?


Takashi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/