Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC] [PATCH] Reducing average ext2 fsck time through fs-wide dirty bit]

From: Valerie Henson
Date: Wed Mar 22 2006 - 17:46:38 EST


On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 11:09:18AM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 17:10 -0800, Valerie Henson wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am working on reducing the average time spent on fscking ext2 file
> > systems. My initial take on the problem is to avoid fscking when the
>
> Just curious, why are you teaching ext2 same tricks that are in ext3 ?
> Is there a reason behind improving ext2 ? Are there any benefits
> of not using ext3 instead ?

ext2 is simpler and faster than ext3 in many cases. This is sort of
cheating; ext2 is simpler and faster because it makes no effort to
maintain on-disk consistency and can skip annoying things like, oh,
reserving space in the journal. I am looking for ways to make ext2
cheat even more.

-VAL
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/