Re: [PATCH] possible scheduler deadlock in 2.6.16
From: Peter Williams
Date: Wed Mar 22 2006 - 17:50:04 EST
Nick Piggin wrote:
Anton Blanchard wrote:
One way to solve this is to always take runqueues in cpu id order. To do
this we add a cpu variable to the runqueue and check it in the
double runqueue locking functions.
You're right. I can't think of a better fix, although we've been trying
to avoid adding cpu to the runqueue structure.
But now that it's there it will enable further optimizations in parts of
sched.c, wouldn't it? E.g. there's a number of functions that get
passed both the run queue and the CPI id as arguments and these could be
Peter Williams pwil3058@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
-- Ambrose Bierce
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/