Re: [ck] swap prefetching merge plans
From: Nick Piggin
Date: Thu Mar 23 2006 - 03:55:27 EST
jos poortvliet wrote:
Op donderdag 23 maart 2006 08:04, schreef Con Kolivas:
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 03:53 pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
A look at the -mm lineup for 2.6.17:
Still don't have a compelling argument for this, IMO.
well, the reason i use it is my computer is much more reactive in the morning.
linux uses to get very slow after a night of not-doing-much except some
'sleep 5h && blabla' and cron stuff. in the morning it takes a few HOURS to
get up and running smoothly. with swap prefetch, it actually feels faster
compared to a fresh boot. now you can force swap prefetch to start working, i
use it now and then after some heavy taskts which pulled everything to swap.
I have two issues with this argument (not that I'm trying to say it
couldn't make a difference in your case).
Firstly, swap prefetch actually doesn't handle the midnight updatedb pageout
problem nicely. It doesn't do any prefetching when the pagecache/vfs cache
fills memory (which is what would have to happen for updatedb to push stuff
Secondly, with or without swap prefetch, I think we can do a better job of
handling these use-once patterns to begin with.
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/