Re: [RFC PATCH 35/35] Add Xen virtual block device driver.

[Jeff Garzik]

Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 08:37 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > In fact, SCSI should make a few things easier, because the notion of 
> > > host+bus topology is already present, and notion of messaging is already 
> > > present, so you don't have to recreate that in a Xen block device 
> > > infrastructure.
> > Another benefit of SCSI:  when an IBM hypervisor in the Linux kernel 
> > switched to SCSI, that allowed them to replace several drivers (virt 
> > disk, virt cdrom, virt floppy?) with a single virt-SCSI driver.

> but there's a generic one for that: iSCSI
> so in theory you only need to provide a network driver then ;)

Talk about lots of overhead :)

OTOH, I bet that T10 is acting at high speed, right this second, to form 
a committee, and multiple sub-committees, to standardize SCSI 
transported over XenBus.  SXP anyone?  :)

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/