Re: [OT] Non-GCC compilers used for linux userspace

[Kyle Moffett]

On Mar 28, 2006, at 12:28:47, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 12:13:15PM -0500, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> > On Mar 28, 2006, at 11:59:13, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > > > > > > "KM" == Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@xxxxxxx> writes:
> > > > So does anybody compile userspace under anything other than GCC  
> > > > or Intel compilers?  Do any such compilers even exist?
> > >
> > > PGI and PathScale are around.  Lahey, too, although they seem to  
> > > just do Fortran now.
> > >
> > > I doubt you'd want to worry about compiling the entire userland  
> > > with these compilers, however.
> >
> > Mainly I want to know if I should even bother making the kabi  
> > headers compile with anything other than GCC.  Judging from the  
> > apparently negligible number of users, it doesn't sound like  
> > something I should spend much or any time on, at least for now.
>
> I'm not sure how you got to that conclusion.  People have already  
> named several non-GCC compilers that are used; and most of the  
> users of commercial compilers won't be reading this list.
>
> If you want glibc to ever include these things, they had better be  
> portable C and work without GCC.  Otherwise it's a non-starter.   
> Only GCC may be used to build glibc, but it deliberately supports  
> any conforming C compiler to build userspace code.

Ok, my email was a bit premature (I've gotten a couple other private  
emails about other compilers too) and if people see this as an issue  
then I'll try to make all the code C89-compliant from the start.  I  
just didn't want to go writing a whole bunch of compatibility macros  
only to find out that they never got used.

Cheers,
Kyle Moffett

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/