Re: Please pull from 'for_paulus' branch of powerpc

[Kumar Gala]

On Apr 4, 2006, at 7:28 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> On Tue, 4 Apr 2006 16:14:04 -0500 (CDT) Kumar Gala  
> <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Please pull from 'for_paulus' branch of
> > master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/galak/powerpc.git
> >
> > to receive the following updates:
> >
> >  arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_cds_defconfig |  846 ++++++++++++++++ 
> > +++++++++++++
> >  arch/powerpc/kernel/ppc_ksyms.c            |    1
> >  arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig        |    9
> >  arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Makefile       |    1
> >  arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_cds.c  |  359 ++++++++++++
> >  arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_cds.h  |   43 +
> >  arch/ppc/kernel/ppc_ksyms.c                |    1
> >  include/asm-ppc/mpc85xx.h                  |    3
> >  8 files changed, 1262 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Andy Fleming:
> >       Add 85xx CDS to arch/powerpc
>
> Could these "add xxx to arch/powerpc" patches please move any relevant
> headers files to include/asm-powerpc as well.  It would be nice if we
> could remove the hack from the powerpc Makefile that include files  
> from
> include/asm-ppc.  i.e. My opinion is that if any ARCH=powerpc build
> requires a file in include/asm-ppc, then that file should be moved to
> include/asm-powerpc.  I am doing a set of patches to that effect.

We need the irq rework before I'd be willing to do this.  The main  
dependancy between asm-ppc and asm-powerpc is the static IRQs we  
currently have.  I'd rather spend time on fixing up the IRQ handling  
to parse the flat dev tree.

- kumar
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/