Re: [PATCH] deinline a few large functions in vlan code v2

From: Ingo Oeser
Date: Tue Apr 11 2006 - 05:50:08 EST


Hi Denis,

Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> +#if defined(CONFIG_VLAN_8021Q) || defined(CONFIG_VLAN_8021Q_MODULE)
> if(vlan_tx_tag_present(skb)) {
> first_txd->processFlags |=
> TYPHOON_TX_PF_INSERT_VLAN | TYPHOON_TX_PF_VLAN_PRIORITY;
> @@ -844,6 +849,7 @@ typhoon_start_tx(struct sk_buff *skb, st
> cpu_to_le32(htons(vlan_tx_tag_get(skb)) <<
> TYPHOON_TX_PF_VLAN_TAG_SHIFT);
> }
> +#endif

Wouldn't it be much easier to just do

#if defined(CONFIG_VLAN_8021Q) || defined(CONFIG_VLAN_8021Q_MODULE)
static inline int vlan_tx_tag_present(...) {
/** get VLAN tag */
}
#else
static inline int vlan_tx_tag_present(...) {return 0;}
#endif

in some header file?

Similiar in typhoon.c:

#if defined(CONFIG_VLAN_8021Q) || defined(CONFIG_VLAN_8021Q_MODULE)
static inline has_vlan_group(...) {
/* get VLAN group */
}
#else
static inline has_vlan_group(...) {return 0;}
#endif

With this and similiar changes in the drivers,
your patch might be less intrusive and thus more acceptable to maintainers.

Just let the compiler remove the extra code with constant folding and dead
code elemination. The result will be even cleaner code, I think.

What do you think?


Regards

Ingo Oeser
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/