Re: [PATCH 2/7] tpm: reorganize sysfs files - Updated patch

[Andrew Morton]

Kylene Jo Hall <kjhall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Does that look OK?
> 
>  No this is not ok because in several of these cases the response to the
>  command is longer than tpm_cap thus the reason for the hardcoded size.

OK.

>  I can put in a max function though that compares the size of the
>  response and the tpm_cap.  The read functions will make sure the
>  response does not overflow the buffer should that length ever change in
>  the future.

Well, pretty much anything which will automatically increase the size of
that array in response to changing data structures would suit, thanks.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/