Re: [GIT PATCH] Fixes in the -stable tree, but not in mainline

From: Theodore Ts'o
Date: Tue Apr 18 2006 - 13:34:09 EST


On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 02:29:46PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> Here are 5 patches that are in the -stable tree, yet not currently fixed
> in your mainline tree. One of them is a security fix, so it probably
> would be a good idea to get it into there :)

I thought one of the requirements for accepting a patch into -stable
was that it was already in mainline. Was this a change in policy that
I missed, or just an oversight when we vetted these patches?

Not that I have anything against these patches, just curious in the
future if we should NACK patches proposed for -stable if we notice
that they aren't yet in mainline.

- Ted
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/