Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/11] security: AppArmor - Core access controls

[Rik van Riel]

On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Seth Arnold wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 07:05:08PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > Are confined processes always restricted from starting
> > non-confined processes?
> 
> It is specified in policy via an unconstrained execution flag: 'ux'. Any 
> unconfined children can of course do whatever they wish.

And the default is for the children to inherit the security
policy from the parent process, like in SELinux ?

How do apparmor and selinux differ in how they contain bad
things?

-- 
All Rights Reversed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/