Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview

From: Serge E. Hallyn
Date: Thu Apr 20 2006 - 09:09:13 EST


Quoting grundig (grundig@xxxxxxxxxxx):
> El Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:32:30 -0700,
> Crispin Cowan <crispin@xxxxxxxxxx> escribi?:
>
> > Our controls on changing the name space have rather poor granularity at
> > the moment. We hope to improve that over time, and especially if LSM
> > evolves to permit it. This is ok, because as Andi pointed out, there are
> > currently few applications using name spaces, so we have time to improve
> > the granularity.
>
> Wouldn't have more sense to improve it and then submit it instead of the
> contrary? At least is the rule which AFAIK is applied to every feature
> going in the kernel, specially when there's an available alternative
> which users can use meanwhile (see reiser4...)

hah, that's funny

When people do that, they are rebuked for not submitting upstream. At
least this way, we can have a discussion about whether the approach
makes sense at all.

-serge
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/