RE: kfree(NULL)

[Hua Zhong]

> struct likeliness {
> 	char *file;
> 	int line;
> 	atomic_t true_count;
> 	atomic_t false_count;
> 	struct likeliness *next;
> };

It seems including atomic.h inside compiler.h is a bit tricky (might have interdependency).

Can we just live with int instead of atomic_t? We don't really care about losing a count occasionally..

> It'll crash if a module gets registered then unloaded. 
> CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD=n would be required.

What about init data that is thrown away after boot?

Hua

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/