Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 00/12] CKRM after a major overhaul

[Kirill Korotaev]

> > > > pzone based memory controller:
> > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ckrm-tech&m=113867467006531&w=2
> > > From a super-quick scan that looks saner.  Is it effective?  Is this the
> > > way you're planning on proceeding?
> > Yes, it is effective, and the reclamation is O(1) too. It has couple of
> > problems by design, (1) doesn't handle shared pages and (2) doesn't
> > provide support for both min_shares and max_shares.
>
> Right.  I wanted to show proof-of-cencept of the pzone based controller
> and implemented minimal features necessary as the memory controller.
> So, the pzone based controller still needs development and some cleanup.
Just out of curiosity, how it was meassured that it is effective?
How does it work when there is a global memory shortage in the system?

Thanks,
Kirill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/