Re: C++ pushback

[Greg KH]

On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 02:02:27PM -0600, Gary Poppitz wrote:
> >We know they are "incompatible", why else would we allow "private" and
> >"struct class" in the kernel source if we some how expected it to work
> >with a C++ compiler?
> 
> 
> I can see that this was intentional, not an oversight.
> 
> If there is a childish temper tantrum mentality about C++ then I have  
> no reason or desire to be on this list.

If there is a lack of willingness to do a simple bit of research:
	http://www.google.com/search?q=linux+kernel+C%2B%2B
The responses you get back might seem a big harsh.

In short, the rule around here, as well with most groups in life, seems
to be:
	"show no respect, get none in return"

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/