Re: [PATCH/RFC] s390: Hypervisor File System

[Jörn Engel]

On Tue, 25 April 2006 17:33:01 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> 
> To state what I said earlier: the use of a global hypfs_sblk is
> problematic because now we can only have the filesystem mounted once. So
> I would really like to see some other way of updating. How do you feel
> about the s_ops->fs_remount thing?

It sounds as if part of hypfs is a global resource.  Maybe the code
could be split between a global get-and-store-data part and a
per-filesystem representation part?

Jörn

-- 
Invincibility is in oneself, vulnerability is in the opponent.
-- Sun Tzu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/