Re: [PATCH 3/3] Assert notifier_block and notifier_call are not ininit section

[Chandra Seetharaman]

On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 19:47 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, sekharan@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > 
> > 	Feel free to drop this patch if you think it is not needed.
> 
> It's incorrect.
> 
> The init section will be free'd, and as a result can be re-allocated to 
> other uses. Thus testing that data is not in the init-section makes no 
> sense.
>
> Testing for _code_ not being in the init section can be sensible, since 
> code never gets re-allocated (modulo module code, but that's never in the 
> init section). So checking the "notifier_call" part may be sensible, but 
> checking the notifier block data pointer definitely is not.

Two questions:
1) related to this patch: Do you want me to generate a patch that
asserts only notifier calls ?

2) Unrelated to this patch: If the _code_ section is never reallocated
or reused, what is the purpose of putting _code_ in the init section ?
Only to make sure that the init calls are called in order ?

Thanks

chandra
PS: I fixed my mailer to put my name. sorry about that.

> 
> Patches 1-2 applied.
> 
> 		Linus
-- 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Chandra Seetharaman               | Be careful what you choose....
              - sekharan@xxxxxxxxxx   |      .......you may get it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/