Re: C++ pushback

From: Martin Mares
Date: Tue Apr 25 2006 - 15:50:26 EST


> Hahaha. So now, it's not good enough that they not ask you to do anything,
> they have to actively *prevent* you from choosing to waste time on their
> changes?

If you wish to interpret it that way, I won't prevent you :-)

Anyway -- what I meant is that even if somebody writes a patch changing
names to avoid collisions with C++, _merging_ such a patch could be
easily a waste of other people's time, especially when there is no
other advantage in merging such a patch (like if the reason is that
somebody wishes to port his closed-source driver to Linux [*]).

[*]: Not that I'm claiming that this is the case now, but it already
happened.

Have a nice fortnight
--
Martin `MJ' Mares <mj@xxxxxx> http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mj/
Faculty of Math and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Rep., Earth
First law of socio-genetics: Celibacy is not hereditary.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/