Re: [PATCH] drivers/scsi/sd.c: fix uninitialized variable in handlingmedium errors

[Mark Lord]

Andrew Morton wrote:
> Mark Lord <lkml@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > > That's if we think -stable needs this fixed.
> > Let's say a bunch of read bio's get coalesced into a single
> > 200+ sector request.  This then fails on one single bad sector
> > out of the 200+.  Without the patch, there is a very good chance
> > that sd.c will simply fail the entire request, all 200+ sectors.
> >
> > With the patch, it will fail the first block, and then retry
> > the remaining blocks.  And repeat this until something works,
> > or until everything has failed one by one.
>
> Yowch.  I have the feeling that this'll take our EIO-handling time from
> far-too-long to far-too-long*200.
>
> I am still traumatised by my recent ten-minute wait for a dodgy DVD to
> become ejectable.
>
> I don't think -stable needs this, personally.

Perhaps, perhaps not.  The current behaviour is semi *random*, though.
Sometimes it may just fail the entire request (wrong!),
sometimes it may do the (almost as wrong) fail a block at a time
from the beginning, until the bad sector is passed, and then succeed
on the remainder.

Ugh.
> > What I need to have happen when a request is failed due to bad-media,
> > is have it split the request into a sequence of single-block requests
> > that are passed to the LLD one at a time.  The ones with real bad
> > sectors will then be independently failed, and the rest will get done.
> >
> > Much better.  Much more complex.

--
Mark Lord
Real-Time Remedies Inc.
mlord@xxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/